Year 2018 Vol. 26 No 6

REVIEWS

S.A. MARKOSYAN 1, N.M. LYSYAKOV 2

ETIOLOGY, PATHOGENESIS AND PROPHYLAXIS OF ADHESIONS IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY

National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University, Medical Institute1,
Mordovia Republican Center for Advanced
Training of Health Professionals 2, Saransk,
The Russian Federation

The review presents the data on the etiology and pathogenesis of intra-abdominal adhesions after abdominal surgical interventions. It has been shown that the main etiological preconditions for formation of adhesions and the development of adhesive intestinal obstruction are a peritoneal injury, intraabdominal bleeding, presence of infection and foreign bodies in the abdominal cavity, influence of various aggressive substances, local antibiotic therapy, and regional tissue ischemia. This leads to an increase in the amount of peritoneal fluid, the penetration of microorganisms into the abdominal cavity with disturbance of the metabolism of the peritoneum mesothelium and damage to the cellular membranes, tissue organization of fibrinous matrix, degranulation of lysosomal enzymes, the pituitary-adrenal insufficiency, and the development of hypercoagulation and postoperative paresis of the intestine. The situation is aggravated by the addition of an autoimmune or allergic component to the inflammatory process.
The main modern methods of adhesion prevention are described, taking into account the latest achievements in abdominal surgery, including the use of D-penicillamine, the drugs blocking the activity of collagen synthesis enzymes, anticoagulants of various actions, gels Polymers, proteolytic enzymes, antioxidants, hemostatics, hyperbaric oxygenation, as well as insufflation of carbon dioxide into the abdominal cavity. A special place is given to the use of synthetic absorbable suture materials, dynamic laparoscopy and laparoscopic adhesion.

Keywords: adhesions, abdominal cavity, intestinal obstruction, abdominal surgery
p. 735-744 of the original issue
References
  1. Chekmazov IA. Spaechnaia bolezn' briushiny. Moscow, RF; 2008. 160 p. (in Russ.)
  2. Markos'ian SA, Lysiakov NM. Experimental evaluation of changes in some indicators coagulation-lytic system of the blood in ischemic part of the small intestine with anastomosis after intraoperative paravasal routes of administration of heparin. Vestn Eksperim i Klin Khirurgii. 2012;(4):690-693. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18059161
  3. Whang SH, Astudillo JA, Sporn E, Bachman ShL, Miedema BW, Davis W, Thaler K. In search of the best peritoneal adhesion model: comparison of different techniques in a rat model. J Surg Res. 2011 May 15;167(2):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.020
  4. Lutsevich OE, Akimov VP, Shirinskiy VG, Bichev AA. Formation and modern approaches to its prevention. a systematic review. Moskov Khirurg Zhurn. 2017;(3):11-26. http://mossj.ru/journal/MOSSJ_2017/MOSSJ_2017_03.pdf (in Russ.)
  5. Gainsbury ML, Chu DI, D'Addese L, Reed KL, Stucchi AF, Becker JM. Key regulators of adhesiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), are reduced by the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) in a rat model of intraabdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2010 Febr;158(2):255. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.234
  6. Alonso Jde M, Alves AL, Watanabe MJ, Rodrigues CA, Hussni CA. Peritoneal response to abdominal surgery: the role of equine abdominal adhesions and current prophylactic strategies. Vet Med Int. 2014;2014:279730. doi: 10.1155/2014/279730
  7. Rodgers KE, diZerega GS. Function of peritoneal exudate cells after abdominal surgery. J Invest Surg. 1993 Jan-Feb;6(1):9-23. doi: 10.3109/08941939309141188
  8. Mailova KS, Osipova AA, Corona R, Binda M, Koninckx F, Adamian LV. Intraoperative bleeding: adhesions formation and methods of their prevention in mice. Problemy Reproduktsii. 2012;(2):18-22. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18022552 (in Russ.)
  9. Koninckx PR, Gomel V, Ussia A, Adamyan L. Role of the peritoneal cavity in the prevention of postoperative adhesions, pain, and fatigue. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):998-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.012
  10. Andreev AA, Ostroushko AP, Kir'ianova DV, Sotnikova ES, Britikov VN. Adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity. Vest Eksperim i Klin Khirurgii. 2017;X(4):320-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326963145_Adhesive_disease_of_the_abdominal_cavity/fulltext/5b6e911fa6fdcc87df717ec2/326963145_Adhesive_disease_of_the_abdominal_cavity.pdf?origin=publication_detail (in Russ.)
  11. Gomon MS, Konoplya AI, Lipatov VA, Bezhin AI, Loktionov AL, Sukovatykh BS, Kas'yanova MA, Besedin AV. The dynamic changes of immunologic reactivity at stimulation of adhesive process in abdomen cavity. Vestn Novykh Med Tekhnologii. 2008;15(1):35-37. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13071920 (in Russ.)
  12. Petlakh VI, Lipatov VA, Eletskaya ES, Sergeev AV. Morphology of postoperative abdominal adhesions. Detskaia Khirurgiia. 2014;(1):42-46. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/morfologiya-formirovaniya-posleoperatsionnyh-bryushinnyh-spaek (in Russ.)
  13. Skipetrov VP, Vlasov AP, Golyshenkov SP. Koaguliatsionno-liticheskaia sistema tkanei i trombogemorragicheskii sindrom v khirurgii: monografiia. Saransk, RF: Izd-vo Mordov un-ta; 2011. 192 (in Russ.)
  14. Sapin MR, Miliukov VE, Dolgov EN, Bogdanov AV, Murshudova KhM, Nguen KK, Polunin SV. Acute adrenal insufficiency in the acute intestinal obstruction Vestn Eksperim i Klin khirurgii. 2013; VI(1):90-99. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20615928 (in Russ.)
  15. Vlasov AP, Rubtsov OIu, Trofimov VA. Lipidnyi distress-sindrom pri spaechnoi bolezni. Saransk, RF: Krasnyi Oktiabr'; 2006. 280 p. (in Russ.)
  16. Habriyev RU, Kamayev NO, Danilova TI, Kakhoyan EG. Peculliarities of the action of Osobennosti deistviia hyaluronidase of different origin to the connective tissue. Biomed Khimiia. 2016;62(1):82-88.) http://i.uran.ru/webcab/system/files/journalspdf/biomedicinskaya-himiya/biomedicinskaya-himiya-2016-t62-n-1/2016621.pdf (in Russ.)
  17. Nazarenko AA, Akimov VP, Malyshkin PO. Epidemiologiia, patogenez i profilaktika posleoperatsionnogo spaechnogo protsessa v briushnoi polosti. Vestn Khirurgii im II Grekova. 2016;175(5):114-18. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-5-114-118. (in Russ.)
  18. Shapoval'iants SG, Larichev SE, Babkova IV, Timofeev ME, Safarov AN. Differentsial'naia diagnostika form ostroi spaechnoi tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti. Moskovskii Khirurgicheskii Zhurnal. 2013;3(31):29-33. http://mossj.ru/journal/MOSSJ_2013/MXG_2013_03.pdf. (in Russ.)
  19. Malkov IS, Bagautdinov EB, Sharafislamov IF, Zogot SR, Misiev DKh. Acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: laparotomy or laparoscopy. Kaz Med Zhurn. 2018;99(3):508-14. doi: 10.17816/KMJ2018-508. (in Russ.)
  20. Tarasenko SV, Zaitsev OV, Sokolov PV, . Natalsky AA, Prus SIu, Rakhmaev TS, Bogomolov AIu, Kulikova IV. Laparoscopic access in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction. Vestn Khirurgii im II Grekova. 2018;177(2):30-33. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-2-30-33. (in Russ.)
  21. Filenko BP, Lazarev SM, Efremova SV. Surgeon's strategy in recurrent adhesive intestinal obstruction. Vestn Khirurgii im II Grekova. 2010;169(6):75-79. https://www.pressa-rf.ru/rucont/login_reg/ (in Russ.)
  22. Shapoval'iants SG, Larichev SE, Timofeev ME, Soldatova NA. Otsenka riska retsidiva ostroi spaechnoi tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti, razreshennoi konservativnym putem. Ros Zhurn Gastrenterol Gepatol Koloproktologii. 2009;19(6):34-38. (in Russ.)
  23. Izbasarov RZh. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the management of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction. Endoskop Khirurgiia. 2013;19(2):28-30. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19068912. (in Russ.)
  24. Stepanian SA, Apoian VT, Mesropian RN, Eiramdzhian KhT, Zanadvorov LV, Petrosian AA, Egiazarian GG. Primenenie protivospaechnykh sredstv v profilaktike spaechnoi bolezni zhivota. Vestn Khirurgii im II Grekova. 2012;171(1):45-49. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/primenenie-protivospaechnyh-sredstv-v-profilaktike-spaechnoy-bolezni-zhivota. (in Russ.)
  25. Strizheletskii VV, Ryvkin AIu, Makarov SA, Suvorov II, Li MV. New possibilities in diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute adhesive bowel obstruction with the use of endovideosurgery. Endoskop Khirurgiia. 2011;17(3):7-10. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18869162. (in Russ.)
  26. Plechev VV, Latypov RZ, Timerbulatov VM, Pashkov SA, Sufiiarov IF, Gumerov AA, Izosimov AN. Khirurgiia spaechnoi bolezni briushiny: ruk. Ufa, RF: Bashkortostan; 2015. 748 p. http://repo.bashgmu.ru/xmlui/handle/123456789/292. (in Russ.)
  27. Magomedov MA, Abdulgadiev VS. Result treatment of of acute intestinal obstruction. Moskov Khirurg Zhurn. 2017;(4):5-7. http://mossj.ru/journal/MOSSJ_2017/MOSSJ_2017_04.pdf (in Russ.)
  28. Svinoboi IN, Lazareva LP. Operativnaia laparoskopiia v lechenii spaechnoi bolezni u detei mladshego vozrasta. Med sestra. 2004; (2): 9-10. https://medsestrajournal.ru/ru/medsestra-2004-02-06. (in Russ.)
  29. Sukovatykh BS, Zhukovskii VA, Lipatov VA, Blinkov IuIu. Sovremennye tekhnologii profilaktiki posleoperatsionnogo spaikoobrazovaniia. Vestn Khirurgii im II Grekova. 2014;173(5):98-104. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2014-173-5-98-104. (in Russ.)
  30. Markos`yan SA, Lysyakov NM, Ismail Alawal MA, Irkova KI, Martyanov IV. Effect of intraoperative heparin administration on some indices of the blood coagulatory-lytic system in the ischemic region of the small intestine with anastomosis. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2014; 156 (6): 753-755. doi: 10.1007/s10517-014-2441-0. (in Russ.)
  31. Klimovich IN, Maskin SS, Dubrovin IA, Karsanov AM, Derbentseva TV. Endovideokhirurgiia v diagnostike i lechenii posleoperatsionnogo peritonita. Vestn Khirurgii im II Grekova. 2015;174 (4):113-16. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-4-113-116 (in Russ.)
  32. Ten Broek RP, Stommel MW, Strik C, van Laarhoven CJ, Keus F, van Goor H. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9911):48-59. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61687-6
  33. Falabella CA, Melendez MM, Weng L, Chen W. Novel macromolecular crosslinking hydrogel to reduce intra-abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2010 Apr; 159(2):772-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.09.035
  34. Lang R, Baumann P, Schmoor C, Odermatt EK, Wente MN, Jauch KW. A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I-II safety study. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2015;9:5. doi: 10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1
  35. Lavreshin PM, Gobejishvili VK,.Gobejishvili VV, Kelasov IG. The predictions and prophylaxis of intraabdominal adhesion in patients with acute intesninal non-tumor obstruction. Vestn Eksperim i Klin Khirurgii. 2012;(1):65-70 (in Russ.)
  36. Cherdantsev DV, Vinnik IuS, Kasparov EV, Titova RM, Pervova OV. Diagnostika i lechenie okislitel'nogo stressa pri ostrom pankreatite. Krasnoiarsk, RF: Bona Company; 2002. 146 p. (in Russ.)
  37. De Lano FA, Schmit PJ, Schmid-Schnbein GW, Saltzman DJ. Enteral and peritoneal blockade of serine proteolytic enzymes decreases post-operative adhesions. J Surg Res. 2012 Feb;172(2):340. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.11.694
  38. Esposito AJ, Heydrick SJ, Cassidy MR, Gallant J, Stucchi AF, Becker JM. Substance P is an early mediator of peritoneal fibrinolytic pathway genes and promotes intra-abdominal adhesion formation. J Surg Res. 2013 May 1;181(1): 25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.056
  39. Ward BC, Kavalukas S, Brugnano J, Barbul A, Panitch A. Peptide inhibitors of MK2 show promise for inhibition of abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2011 Jul;169(1):e27-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.01.043
  40. Yuzbasioglu MF, Ezberci F, Imrek E, Bulbuloglu E, Kurutas EB, Imrek S. The effect of intraperitoneal catalase on prevention of peritoneal adhesion formation in rats. J Invest Surg. 2008;21(2):65-69. doi: 10.1080/08941930701883616
  41. Hoffmann NE, Siddiqui SA, Agarwal S, McKellar SH, Kurtz HJ, Gettman MT, Ereth MH. Choice of hemostatic agent influences adhesion formation in a rat cecal adhesion model. J Surg Res. 2009 Jul;155(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.08.008
  42. Peng Y, Zheng M, Ye Q, Chen X, Yu B, Liu B. Heated and humidified CO2 prevents hypothermia, peritoneal injury, and intraabdominal adhesions during prolonged laparoscopic insufflations. J Surg Res. 2009 Jan;151(1):40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.039.
  43. Raptis DA, Vichova B, Breza J, Skipworth J, Barker S. A comparison of woven versus nonwoven polypropylene (PP) and expanded versus condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on their intraperitoneal incorporation and adhesion formation. J Surg Res. 2011 Jul;169(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.12.014
  44. Baranov GA, Karbovskii MIu. Otdalennye rezul'taty operativnogo ustraneniia spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti. Khirurgiia Zhurn im NI Pirogova. 2006;(7):56-60. (in Russ.)
  45. Dudanov IP, Sobolev BE. Laparoskopiia pri ostroi spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti. Endoskop Khirurgiia. 2005;11(1):46-47. (in Russ.)
  46. Khasanov AG, Sufiyarov IF, Kayumov FA. Method of peritonization of the small intestine for prophylaxis of the development of peritoneal adhesions. Vestn Khirurgii im II Grekova. 2008;167(5):34-36. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sposob-peritonizatsii-tonkoy-kishki-dlya-profilaktiki-posleoperatsionnyh-spaek-v-abdominalnoy-hirurgii (in Russ.)
  47. Gungor B, Malazgirt Z, Topgül K, Gök A, Bilgin M, Yürüker S. Comparative evaluation of adhesions to intraperitoneally placed fixation materials: a laparoscopic study in rats. Indian J Surg. 2010 Dec;72(6):475-80. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0168-3
  48. Gasparov AS, Dubinskaia ED. Tazovye peritoneal'nye spaiki. Etiologiia, patogenez, diagnostika, profilaktika. Moscow, RF: Med inform agentstvo; 2013. 168 p. https://www.ya-zdorova.ru/netcat_files/userfiles/images/useful-links/monograf-1.pdf (in Russ.)
  49. Beburishvili AG, Mikhin IV, Vorob'eva AA, Kalmykova OP, Gal'chuk GG. Laparoskopicheskie operatsii pri spaechnoi bolezni. Khirurgiia Zhurn im NI Pirogova. 2004;(6):27-30. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25702629 (in Russ.)
  50. Shavaleev RR, Plechev VV, Kornilaev PG, Garipov RM, Duniushkin SE, Pashkov SA. Laparoskopicheskoe lechenie spaechnoi bolezni briushnoi polosti. Khirurgiia. Zhurn im NI Pirogova. 2005;(4):31-32. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28100994 (in Russ.)
Address for correspondence:
430032, The Russian Federation,
Saransk, Ulyanov Str., 26 a,
Medical Institute, National Research Ogarev
Mordova State University,
Department of the Faculty Surgery with the
Courses of Topographic Anatomy and
Operative Surgery, Urology and Pediatric Surgery,
mob.tel. +79176990604,
e-mail: markosyansa@mail.ru,
Sergey A. Markosyan
Information about the authors:
Markosyan Sergey, MD, Associate Professor, Department of the Faculty Surgery with the Courses of Topographic Anatomy and Operative Surgery, Urology and Pediatric Surgery, National Research Ogarev Mordova State University, Medical Institute, Saransk, Russian Federation.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9876-4433
Lysyakov Nikita, PhD, Lecturer, Mordovia Republican Center for Advanced Training of Health Professionals, Saransk, Russian Federation.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-0982
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007-2023