Novosti
Khirurgii
This journal is
indexed in Scopus



Year 2019 Vol. 27 No 1

TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPEDICS

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2019.1.49   |  

M.A. CHERKASOV, A.G. CHERNYI, I.I. SHUBNYAKOV, A.A. IRZHANSKI, K.K. IDRISOV, R.K. DZAMIKHOV

INTEGRATED QUALITY ASSESMENT OF MEDICAL CARE FROM PATIENTS STANDPOINT

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden,
St. Petersburg,
The Russian Federation

Objective. To assess the quality of medical care and patient satisfaction in a specialized hospital.
Methods. Prospective study of the group consisting of 210 patients hospitalized with different orthopedic pathologies during the period from October to December 2017 was carried out. Before discharge from the hospital, patients were asked to complete the PPE-15 questionnaire (Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire). Beforehand, the PPE-15 questionnaire was translated and adapted for use in Russian-speaking medical practice.
Results. The average age of patients was 49.4 years (CI 95% 46.2-52.6), Male patients were 87 (42%), female patients 120 (58%). The average value of pain by the visual analogue scale was 27.4 points (CI 95% 24.2-30.5), satisfaction with medical support averaged 93 points (CI 95% 90.8-95.2). 91% of patients were ready to recommend treatment at our clinic to their relatives and friends, 6% abstained and left the question unanswered, 3% answered negatively. The connection between patients satisfaction and the 1, 3, 4 and 7 domains of the PPE-15, p<0.001 questionnaire was the strongest. There was no correlation between satisfaction and other factors.
Conclusions. The presented assessment results of patients satisfaction and their readiness to recommend the hospital to their relatives or acquaintances allow us making optimistic forecasts. However, a detailed study of certain aspects of patients experiences on the PPE-15 questionnaire will be useful for monitoring the work of different hospitals or hospital departments and may indicate ways of improving health care. Satisfaction with the process of medical care is indeed one of the goals of the Ministry of Health, and since the patient is the most interested party in assessing its quality, taking into account his opinion on the assistance provided is key to achieving maximum satisfaction with the treatment process.

Keywords: patient satisfaction, medical care quality, scoring systems, surveys and questionnaires, patients experience, traumatology, orthopedics
p. 49-58 of the original issue
References
  1. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Vol I: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Health Administration Press; 1980. 163 .
  2. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. doi: 10.17226/10027
  3. Beattie M, Shepherd A, Howieson B. Do the Institute of Medicines’ (IOM) dimensions of quality capture the current meaning of quality in health care? An integrative review. J Res Nurs. 2013;18(4):288-304. doi: 10.1177/1744987112440568
  4. Patients first and foremost. The initial government response to the report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: Stationary Office; 2013. 84 . https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/170701/Patients_First_and_Foremost.pdf
  5. Fitzpatrick R, Hopkins A. Problems in the conceptual framework of patient satisfaction research: an empirical exploration. Sociol Health Illn. 1983 Nov;5(3):297-11. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10491836
  6. Mazurenko AV, Tikhilov RM, Shubnyakov II, Pliey AS, Bliznyukov VV, Nikolaev DG. Evaluation of the possibilityof restoration of leg length in patients with severe hip dysplasia in different variants of surgical technique of hip replacement. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2010;(3):16-20. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2010-0-3-16-20 (in Russ.)
  7. Locock L, Robert G, Boaz A, Vougioukalou S, Shuldham C, Fielden J, Ziebland S, Gager M, Tollyfield R, Pearcey J. Using a national archive of patient experience narratives to promote local patient-centered quality improvement: an ethnographic process evaluation of ‘accelerated’ experience-based co-design. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Oct;19(4):200-7. doi: 10.1177/1355819614531565
  8. Hardy GE, West MA, Hill F. Components and predictors of patient satisfaction. Br J Health Psychol. 1996 Feb;1(1):65-85. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1996.tb00492.x
  9. Greengross P, Grant K, Collini E. Helpdesk Report: The History and Development of the UK National Health Service 1948–1999. Health Systems Resource Centre, UK; 1999. 39 p. https://www.gov.uk/dfid-research-outputs/helpdesk-report-the-history-and-development-of-the-uk-national-health-service-1948-1999#contents
  10. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London, UK; 2000. 144 . http://1nj5ms2lli5hdggbe3mm7ms5.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2010/03/pnsuk1.pdf
  11. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Oct 1;14(5):353-58, doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.353
  12. Shishliannikova LM. Primenenie korreliatsionnogo analiza v psikhologii. Psikhol Nauka i Obrazovanie. 2009;(1):98-107. http://psyjournals.ru/psyedu/2009/n1/Shishlyannikova.shtml (in Russ.)
  13. Kobyakova OS, Deev IA, Tyufilin DS, Kulikov ES, Tabakaev NA, Vorobyeva OO. Satisfaction with health care: how to measure and compare? Elektron Nauch Zhurn Sotsial’nye Aspekty Zdorov’ia Naseleniia. 2016;49(3). doi: 10.21045/2071-5021-2016-49-3-5
  14. Drinkwater BL. A comparison of the direction-of-perception technique with the Likert method in the measurement of attitudes. J Soc Psychol. 1965 Dec;67(2):189-96. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1965.9922270
  15. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, Richards N, Chandola T. Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):335-39. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335
Address for correspondence:
195427, The Russian Federation,
Saint-Petersburg, Ac. Baykov Str., 8,
Russian Scientific Research Institute
Of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Named after R.R. Vreden,
Scientific Department of Knee Joint Pathology.
Tel.: +7 905 276-48-48,
e-mail: arseni.a.irzhanski@gmail.com,
Arseni A. Irzhanski
Information about the authors:
Cherkasov Magomed A., Post-Graduate Student, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-532X
Cherny Andrey G., PhD, Associate Professor, Deputy Director for Medical Work, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-2340
Shubnyakov Igor I., MD, Chief Researcher, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-3106
Irzhanski Arseni A., Post-Graduate Student, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5939-0216
Idrisov Khasan K., Clinical Intern, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-7001
Dzamihov Ruslan K., Clinical Intern, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2110
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007