Novosti
Khirurgii
This journal is
indexed in Scopus



Year 2019 Vol. 27 No 2

ONCOLOGY

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2019.2.177   |  

I.A. ILYIN

RESULTS OF REPEATED COLON INTERPOSITION FOR ESOPHAGEAL REPLACEMENT IN ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION IN CARCINOMA SURGICAL TREATMENT

N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus, Minsk,
The Republic of Belarus

Objective. To evaluate the results of the repeated colon interposition for esophageal replacement in the esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas surgical treatment.
Methods. Repeated colon interposition after discontinuity resections for ischemic complications of primary gastric or jejunal pull up procedures during the esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas surgical treatment was implemented in 40 patients. Squamous cell esophageal carcinoma was represented in 52.5% (21/40) observations and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in 47.5% (19/40). Patients mean age was 56.0 (52.0, 63.0) years, body mass index 21.4 (18.9, 24.5) units. Male patients predominated over females 90% (36/40) and 10% (4/40) respectively. Repeated reconstructions were preceded by previously performed discontinuity procedures. Esophago-gastric anastomosis resection was performed in 57.5% (23/40) patients, gastric conduit removal ― in 7.5% (3/40), esophageal demucosation with complicated anastomosis resection ― in 35% (14/40).
Results. Time of procedures was 345.0 (310.0, 407.5) minutes, blood loss 400.0 (300.0, 500.0) ml, in-hospital stay 27.5 (21.0, 40.5) days. Esophago-colonic anastomosis leakage and/or an oral end graft necrosis were detected clinically and radiologically on the 8th day after surgery. Anastomotic leakage developed in 12.5% (5/40) observations, graft loss in 5% (2/40). Late esophageal anastomotic strictures, determined by means of esophagocolonoscopy 3 months after the repeated esophagoplasty, were formed in 7.5% (3/40) patients. 30- and 60-day mortality rate made up 7.5% (3/40) and 10% (4/40) cases respectively. Overall 5-year survival was 26.9%.
Conclusions. Repeated colon interposition for esophageal replacement in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas surgical treatment is a salvage procedure for patients who undergo discontinuity surgical interventions which allows achieving satisfactory long-term treatment outcomes.

Keywords: esophageal carcinoma, gastroesophageal junction carcinoma, repeated esophageal replacement by colon interposition, retrosternal route of graft translocation, discontinuity procedure, esophageal demucosation
p. 177-187 of the original issue
References
  1. Vijay K, Godara R, Vijayvergia V. Failed Gastric Pull up after Esophagectomy Managed by Colonic Interposition. Indian J Surg. 2013 Jun;75(Suppl 1):347-49. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0662-x
  2. Kesler KA, Pillai ST, Birdas TJ, Rieger KM, Okereke IC, Ceppa D, Socas J, Starnes SL. “Supercharged” isoperistaltic colon interposition for long-segment esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):1162-68; discussion 1168-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.006
  3. Reslinger V, Tranchart H, D’Annunzio E, Poghosyan T, Quero L, Munoz-Bongrand N, Corte H, Sarfati E, Cattan P, Chirica M. Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long - term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;113(2):159-64. doi: 10.1002/jso.24118
  4. Sacak B, Orfaniotis G, Nicoli F, Liu EW, Ciudad P, Chen SH, Chen HC. Back-up procedures following complicated gastric pull-up procedure for esophageal reconstruction: Salvage with intestinal flaps. Microsurgery. 2016 Oct;36(7):567-72. doi: 10.1002/micr.22520
  5. Fisher RA, Griffiths EA, Evison F, Mason RC, Zylstra J, Davies AR, Alderson D, Gossage JA. A national audit of colonic interposition for esophageal replacement. Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 1;30(5):1-10. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow003
  6. Awsakulsutthi S, Havanond C. A retrospective study of anastomotic leakage between patients with and without vascular enhancement of esophageal reconstructions with colon interposition: Thammasat University Hospital experience. Asian J Surg. 2015 Jul;38(3):145-49. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.01.005
  7. Uchiyama H, Shirabe K, Morita M, Kakeji Y, Taketomi A, Soejima Y, Yoshizumi T, Ikegami T, Harada N, Kayashima H, Morita K, Maehara Y. Expanding the applications of microvascular surgical techniques to digestive surgeries: a technical review. Surg Today. 2012 Jan;42(2):111-20. doi: 10.1007/s00595-011-0032-5
  8. Ilyin IA, Malkevich VT. Repeated and delayed esophagoplasty in esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer treatment. Izv NAN Belarusi. Ser Med Nauk. 2016;(2):15-22. (in Russ.)
  9. Saeki H, Morita M, Harada N, Egashira A, Oki E, Uchiyama H, Ohga T, Kakeji Y, Sakaguchi Y, Maehara Y. Esophageal replacement by colon interposition with microvascular surgery for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: the utility of superdrainage. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jan;26(1):50-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01327.x
  10. Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):1919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.119
  11. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603
  12. Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Schneider M, Ophoff K, Schumpelick V, Jansen M. Operative outcome of colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal cancer: a 20-year experience. Surgery. 2010 Apr;147(4):491-96. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.045
  13. Brown J, Lewis WG, Foliaki A, Clark GWB, Blackshaw GRJC, Chan DSY. Colonic Interposition After Adult Oesophagectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Conduit Choice and Outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jun;22(6):1104-11. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3735-8
  14. Bakshi A, Sugarbaker DJ, Burt BM. Alternative conduits for esophageal replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar;6(2):137-43. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.07
  15. Ceroni M, Norero E, Henríquez JP, Viñuela E, Briceño E, Martínez C, Aguayo G, Araos F, GonzÁlez P, Díaz A, Caracci M. Total esophagogastrectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy with transverse colon interposition: a treatment for extensive esophagogastric junction cancer. World J Hepatol. 2015 Oct 8;7(22):2411-17. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i22.2411
  16. Malkevich VT, Zharkov VV, Ositrova LI, Kurchin VP, Baranov AYu, Ilyin I.A. New approaches to treatment of intrapleural complications in esophageal cancer surgery. Novosti Khirurgii. 2012;20(3):74-80. http://www.surgery.by/pdf/full_text/2012_3_12_ft.pdf (in Russ.)
  17. Okeanov AE, Moiseev PI, Levin LF, Evmenenko AA, Sukonko OG. (red). Statistika onkologicheskikh zabolevanii v Respublike Belarus’ (2007-2016)=Statistics of cancer diseases in the Republic of Belarus (2007-2016): analiticheskii obzor po dannym Belorusskogo kantser-registra. Minsk, RB: RNPTs OMR; 2017. 286 p. (in Russ.)
Address for correspondence:
223040, The Republic of Belarus,
Minsk region, Lesnoy 2,
N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer
Centre of Belarus,
Surgical Department.
Tel. office.: 8 017 389 95 32,
e-mail: ileus@tut.by,
Ilya A. Ilyin
Information about the authors:
Ilyin Ilya A., PhD, Leading Researcher of the Surgical Department, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-7618
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007