Year 2010 Vol. 18 No 6

ANESTHESIOLOGY-REANIMATOLOGY

MAMAS A.N., KOSAREVSKAYA T.E.

INVESTIGATION OF «BURNOUT SYNDROME» OF ANAESTHESIOLOGISTS-REANIMATOLOGISTS

Objectives. To study the degree of intensity of «burnout syndrome» as well as the factors, influencing given syndrome development in the anesthesiologists-reanimatologists.
Methods. 119 anesthesiologists-reanimatologists of various experience length groups were investigated. The intensity degree of «burnout syndrome» and its link with the experience length of the professional activity and the sex of anesthesiologists-reanimatologists were studied.
Results. Significant differences in the intensity degree and the structure of «burnout syndrome» in anesthesiologists-reanimatologists were determined depending on the experience length of the professional activity. The course of «burnout syndrome» has its own peculiarities in males and females.
Conclusions. The obtained data testify to the expediency of practical introducing of special programs aimed to reveal «burnout syndrome» in anesthesiologists-reanimatologists and if necessary to render a psychological assistance to them.

Keywords: professional activity of anesthesiologists-reanimatologists, «burnout syndrome»
p. 75 – 81 of the original issue
References
  1. Абдоминальная хирургическая инфекция: современное состояние и ближайшее будущее в решении актуальной клинической проблемы / И. А. Ерюхин [и др.] // Инфекции в хирургии. – 2007. – Т. 5. – № 1. – С. 45-49.
  2. Неотложная абдоминальная хирургия: справочное пособие для врачей / под ред. А. А. Гринберга. – М.: Триада-Х, 2000. – 496 с.
  3. Ciprofloxacin in primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study / R. Terg [et al.] // J. Hepatol. – 2008. – Vol. 48, N 5. – P. 774-779.
  4. Circulating mediators and organ function in patients undergoing planned relaparotomy vs conventional surgical therapy in severe secondary peritonitis / N. Zugel [et al.] // Arch. Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 137, N 5. – P. 590-599.
  5. Буренко, Г. В. Новые аспекты интенсивной терапии перитонита, осложненного сепсисом / Г. В. Буренко, М. В. Бондарь, В. М. Мехлин // Клин. хирургия. – 1996. – № 2. – С. 13-14.
  6. Лечение тяжелых форм распространенного перитонита / Б. С. Брискин [и др.] // Хирургия. – 2003. – № 8. – С. 56-59.
  7. Conservative surgical treatment of diffuse peritonitis / C. A. Seiler [et al.] // Surgery. – 2000. – Vol. 127, N 2. – P. 178-184.
  8. Malangoni, M. A. Evaluation and management of tertiary peritonitis / M. A. Malangoni // Am. Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 66, N 2. – Р. 157-161.
  9. Wittmann, D. H. Scope and limitations of antimicrobial therapy of sepsis in surgery / D. H. Wittmann, A. Wittmann-Tylor // Langenbecks Arch. Surg. – 1998. – Vol. 383, N 1. – Р. 15-20.
  10. Demmel, N. Differeentiated treatment strategy for peritonitis: Single stage closure with drainage or open with programmed reintervention lavage? / N. Demmel, G. Osterholzer, B. Gunther // Zentralbl. Chir. – 1993. – Vol. 118, N 7. – P. 395-400.
  11. Послеоперационные осложнения у больных перитонитом / Б. К. Шуркалин [и др.] // Хирургия. – 2003. – № 4. – С. 32-35.
  12. Wittmann, D. H. Management of secondary peritonitis / D. H. Wittmann, M. Schein, R. E. Condon // Ann. Surg. – 1996. – Vol. 224, N 1. – P. 10-18.
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007-2023